Where’s David Cameron? Ex-PM ridiculed after interventions from four former leaders

The former Conservative leader who led the country from 2010 to 2016 has yet to weigh in on the political drama as the UK and Brussels inch closer to the transition period deadline without a deal in sight. Four former Tory leaders have been vocal about their feelings as the post-Brexit trade talks with the EU drag on.The interventions were made following the release of Boris Johnson’s Internal Market Bill, which a government Minister admitted in the House of Commons does breach international law.

Former Tory Prime Minister Sir John Major this week issued a strongly-worded statement condemning the Government’s Internal Market Bill.

Theresa May has also been outspoken about her opposition to the proposed legislation, warning it would erode “trust” in the UK in future trade deals with other nations.

And Mr Cameron’s former foreign secretary William Hague, who led the Tories from 1997 to 2001, has called on Boris Johnson’s Government to “stop being so stubborn about state aid” in a bid to clinch a free trade deal with the EU.

Lord Howard, former leader of the Conservative Party, has also publicly challenged No 10 on the bill which seeks to undermine parts of the Withdrawal Agreement Britain negotiated with the bloc.

Sky News presenter Adam Boulton questioned why Mr Cameron was keeping so quiet in the midst of the Brexit furore.

He tweeted: “Major, May, Howard, Hague, where’s David Cameron?”

Many people said they would love to hear Mr Cameron’s take on how the Government is handling the Brexit saga.

One person said: “Maybe David Cameron would like to clarify where he stands on a British Government breaking international law/treaties?”

READ MORE: Brexit LIVE: ‘Fair and open!’ Frost hits back at Barnier

The Government published the bill on Wednesday after admitting it would break international law.

It can override parts of the Brexit deal Mr Johnson signed with the EU in January.

The bill lays out how ministers would have the power to disapply or change expert declarations for goods moving from Britain to Northern Ireland.

The Prime Minister has claimed it would protect the Northern Ireland peace process.

As he vowed to press ahead with the controversial legislation, his critics, many in the Tory party, accused him of risking the country’s reputation on the world stage.

Sir John said: “For generations, Britain’s word – solemnly given – has been accepted by friend and foe.

“Our signature on any treaty or agreement has been sacrosanct.

“If we lose our reputation for honouring the promises we make, we will have lost something beyond price that may never be regained.”

An emergency meeting was held in London on Thursday between Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove and the European Commission’s Vice-President Maros Sefcovic to discuss the move.

Mr Sefcovic, who co-chairs the EU-UK Joint Committee with Mr Gove, asked for the bill to be withdrawn within a month, a request which was shot down by his counterpart.

Mr Gove said: “I explained to Vice-President Sefcovic that we could not and would not do that and instead I stressed the vital importance of reaching an agreement through the Joint Committee on these important questions.”

Queen shock: Her Majesty ‘not concerned’ with Meghan Markle’s US election interventions

Meghan Markle issued a rallying cry to her fellow Americans to vote in the upcoming US election race between Donald Trump and Democrat nominee and former vice-president Joe Biden. The Duchess of Sussex said voting on November 3 was “exceptionally important” in order to “see the change that we all need and deserve”.

Grant Harrold, who worked a butler for the Royal Family for seven years, claimed since Meghan and Harry had stepped away from their senior royal roles the Duchess’s intervention into politics would not have worried the Queen.

The former royal butler told Express.co.uk: “I believe that the Queen would not be concerned either way, as they have stepped down from the Royal family to pursue their own life and careers.

“So she would most likely say this is a personal decision and it is up to her to do as she pleases.”

Meghan and Harry are currently living in Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, and Mr Harrold expects the Duchess – who retained her US citizenship – to cast her ballot in the election.

Following Meghan and Harry’s decision to exit the firm at the end of March, the royal commentator added the 39-year-old would also be able to go further and endorse a candidate.

Mr Harrold said: “I am sure Meghan will vote in the upcoming elections by how we have seen her urging everyone else to do so.

“However, who she chooses to vote for will obviously be down to her preference.

“As a royal, this would have been unthinkable but as they have stepped away from that life she would be able to support a candidate for president.”

The polls between the Republican Trump and Democrat Biden continue to narrow ahead of election day.

Mr Harrold insists any public backing from Meghan would “without question highlight that candidate”, but he is unconvinced it to sway voters for either man to secure the keys to the White House.

The royal expert added: “Due to the high profile that Meghan now holds, any endorsement would without question highlight that candidate with such a high profile supporter.

READ MORE: Meghan Markle & Harry net worth: How much is Netflix deal worth?

“Because that’s what community is all about and that’s specifically what this election is all about.

“We’re only 75 days away from election day and that is so very close, and yet there’s so much work to be done in that amount of time, because we all know what’s at stake this year.

“I know it, I think all of you certainly know if you’re here on this fun event with us, then you’re just as mobilised and energised to see the change that we all need and deserve.”