The announcement that Sir Mark Sedwill, the Cabinet Secretary and National Security Advisor, stepped down can be seen as the most high profile indi
The announcement that Sir Mark Sedwill, the Cabinet Secretary and National Security Advisor, stepped down can be seen as the most high profile indicator that a revolution will be sweeping through Whitehall over the next four years. Sir Mark will have to be replaced, under Civil Service Commission rules, by another permanent or former permanent secretary – but the role of National Security Advisor has already gone to David Frost, who is currently leading the Brexit negotiations with the EU and is a darling of the Vote Leave movement. It came as Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s controversial chief advisor Dominic Cummings was reported to have warned that a “hard rain” would soon fall on the civil service.
Moreover, during a lecture, Minister for the Cabinet Office Michael Gove laid the intellectual groundwork for the shake-up, in which he set out what he regards as the main faults in the Whitehall machine.
Mr Gove, Mr Johnson and Mr Cummings appear to be showing a united front, driven forward by the belief the country needs deep reform to succeed in a post-Brexit world.
As radical reforms are expected to take place, unearthed reports reveal how in 2015, British taxpayers were forced to pay a staggering £20million on civil servants who were being paid to do nothing.
According to a throwback report by the Daily Express, five years ago, a massive 651 Whitehall staff members had their responsibilities cut, yet remained on the Government’s payroll.
The “invisible army” of civil servants were in redeployment pools waiting to be handed another project to work on.
However, the taxpayer picked up the massive bill.
Redeployment pools were set up to guide Whitehall workers into a new project if they had finished the job they were working on – but the procedure could take months to complete.
It came despite the Conservatives pledging to axe such generous redundancy rules when they came into power in 2010.
At the time, former Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude said the arrangement was “completely indefensible in the current environment”.
He said: “There are people for whom there is actually no job.
JUST IN: How Whitehall civil servants ‘used public money to pay tax bills’
“People who are kind of treading water.”
Figures uncovered by Labour’s former Shadow Cabinet Office Minister Louise Haigh revealed that the 651 staff were spread across nine departments.
The Ministry of Defence had a massive 240 members of staff in aimless roles while the Ministry of Justice, who at the time was under Michael Gove, had 210.
The Home Office under former Prime Minister Theresa May also had 104 staff members without designated projects.
Outraged Mr Haigh said: “This exposes the shameless hypocrisy of the Tories.
“They said the redeployment pool was a waste of money, but with the civil service facing job cuts on an unprecedented scale they’re relying on it.”
Taxpayers’ alliance spokesman Jonathan Isaby also condemned the revelation.
He said: “If there is no work to do then they shouldn’t be kept on.”
Australian PM’s ‘inappropriate’ protocol breach around Prince William [REVEALED]
How Tory MP exposed plot to stop Britain’s departure from EU [INSIGHT]
UK’s critical role in WTO overhaul after no deal exposed [EXCLUSIVE]
The Cabinet Office said the civil service was the smallest it had been since the Second World War.
With Mr Cummings in Government, though, redeployment pools might finally come to an end.
In a 2014 entry on his blog, the Brexit guru had already explained why Whitehall is one of the most “dysfunctional organisations” and needs radical change.
Apart from the obvious fact that in bureaucracies people do not think about saving money the way startups do, Mr Cummings noted, there is also the problem that almost nobody in Whitehall can remember the last time they had to make real cuts.
He wrote: “If you have worked in small businesses (as I have) it is striking how in Whitehall there is no similar mentality about reducing costs.
“This brings us to a fundamental issue. If they are not incentivised to devise good policy, implement it effectively and rapidly, save taxpayers money and so on – what are they incentivised to do? The answer?
“Obsess on process.
“In his new book, the legendary venture capitalist Peter Thiel writes: ‘In the most dysfunctional organisations, signalling that work is being done becomes a better strategy for career advancement than actually doing work (if this describes your company, you should quit now).’”